1 May 2004
Statement By The Ministry Of Foreign Affairs Of Türkiye
1.
Ten new members will be joining the EU on 1 May 2004. The unique case of
Cyprus, which will become a member of the EU, is recognized in the report
of the UN Secretary General of 1 April 2003, which was endorsed by the UN
Security Council, in the following terms: “Cyprus is unique among EU
candidate countries as a standing item on the Security Council agenda and
emerging from a context of conflict.”
2.
The last round of efforts to reach a comprehensive settlement to reunify
the Island was conducted under the good offices mission of the UN Secretary
General since 1999. The main objective of this endeavor was to enable the
Turkish Cypriot side and the Greek Cypriot side to reach a comprehensive
settlement and bring into being a new state of affairs in Cyprus. It was
considered that such a solution before 1 May 2004 would be in the interest
of all concerned, and in the interest of international peace and security.
It would have constituted the only means by which Cyprus could enter the
European Union united on 1 May 2004.
3.
The European Union has repeatedly expressed its strong preference for the
accession of a reunited Cyprus and its support to the good offices mission
of the UN Secretary-General and has made specific commitments to encourage
and promote such an outcome.
4.
During the final round conducted in Switzerland on 31 March 2004, the UN
Secretary-General finalized the plan on the comprehensive settlement of the
Cyprus problem to be submitted on each side for approval at separate and
simultaneous referenda, in close consultation with the two parties in
Cyprus and with Greece and Türkiye.
The Foundation Agreement envisaged the establishment of a United Cyprus,
based on a new bizonal partnership, with a federal government and two
constituent states, namely the Greek Cypriot State and the Turkish Cypriot
State. It is stipulated that “the Constituent States are of equal status,
each of them exercises its authority within its territorial boundaries.”
Furthermore, the Main Articles of the Foundation Agreement envisaged that
“the Greek Cypriots and the Turkish Cypriots affirmed that Cyprus is their
common home and acknowledged each other’s distinct identity and integrity
and that their relationship is not one of majority and minority but of
political equality, where neither side may claim authority or jurisdiction
over the other.”
5.
The EU Commission was present at the final stage of the negotiations in
Switzerland and the EU commitments with regard to the comprehensive
settlement were agreed upon between the parties and the EU Commission.
In the agreed text it was explicitly stated that “the basic principles of
the EU have found their expression in the Foundation Agreement which
introduced a new state of affairs in Cyprus and allows its peaceful
integration into the EU.” In this context, “the political equality of Greek
Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots and the equal status of the two constituent
states” were also underlined.
6.
It was agreed to put the comprehensive settlement to separate simultaneous
referenda, in order to enable the Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots to
exercise their inherent constitutive power, and adopt a settlement by their
free and democratic, separately expressed common will.
7.
The referenda were held in Cyprus on 24 April and overwhelming majority of
Turkish Cypriots voted in favor of the UN Secretary-General’s settlement
plan which would have allowed for a united Cyprus to join the EU on 1 May
2004. However, the Greek Cypriots rejected it with a 75 percent majority,
and efforts to allow a unified Cyprus to join the EU thus failed. In
consequence, the Comprehensive Settlement Plan of the UN Secretary General
has become null and void, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the
Plan.
The Turkish Cypriot people have exercised their inherent constitutive power
and expressed, through transparent and democratic process of referendum,
their wishes for their political future within the EU as constituent
partner of a united Cyprus. It is now incumbent on the EU to acknowledge
and act upon the free and genuine expression of the will of the Turkish
Cypriot people in this regard.
The separate simultaneous referenda held in Cyprus on 24 April 2004
underline the fact that there exist two separate peoples on the island,
neither of which represents the other. Consequently, it would constitute an
untenable claim that there is a single authority to represent the whole
island, disregarding the reality that any solution on the island requires
the consent of both sides.
8.
In view of these facts and circumstances, it is only the Greek Cypriots who
will enter the EU on 1 May 2004 under the terms of the Accession Treaty of
16 April 2003, which was based on a political and legal situation of a
divided Island and consequently does not allow for accession of a united
Cyprus to the EU. Thus, an international conflict is inevitably being
imported into the European Union.
9.
The Greek Cypriots, who will join the EU on 1 May 2004, have no authority
to represent the whole of Cyprus or the Turkish Cypriots. They cannot claim
authority, jurisdiction or sovereignty over the Turkish Cypriots, who have
equal status, or over the entire Island of Cyprus. They cannot impose the
“Republic of Cyprus” on the Turkish Cypriots. Thus, the Greek Cypriots who
organized themselves under their own constitutional order and within their
boundaries cannot be the legitimate government representing the whole of
Cyprus and the Turkish Cypriots.
10.
Turkish Cypriots, as a people who organized themselves under their
constitutional order within their territorial boundaries, exercise
governmental authority, jurisdiction and sovereignty. Türkiye’s recognition
of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus will remain unchanged.
11.
The accession of Southern Cyprus cannot prejudice in whatsoever manner the
rights and obligations of Türkiye regarding Cyprus under the 1960 Treaties.
12.
The official position of the Turkish Government on the political and legal
situation and circumstances that have arisen as a result of Greek Cypriot
rejection of the comprehensive settlement is based on these fundamental
considerations, and legal and political facts.